Discussion about this post

User's avatar
earthlingIB's avatar

To try and not censor myself, I'd like to say that Environment might not just be one of those crises that we face. It is the context in which all other crises take place. We can do something about all other crises only if we still have the livable temperatures, if we still have water to drink and if droughts, fires, floods and heatwaves don't destroy our crops. On the drawing Environment is given equal 'weight' as all other crises, but biophysically speaking, that is not the case - it is by far the most important if we still want to exist as living beings. It is true that it happens at the same time as all other crises, but it doesn't have equal weight with them. To my mind.

And another related thought: what happens when we replace the word 'environment' with web of LIfe? Does that change things in a person's mind or heart? Is there a difference between these two phrases: "industries don't take care of environment and its resources", and "industries don't take care of the Web of LIfe of which we, humans, are a part"? And we are those industries too... we work for them and we buy what they sell. So - does it reverberate differently if we think about Web of LIfe, or the (non-descript) environment? For me it does. Anybody else?

Expand full comment
Kyla Gebeau's avatar

Love this. Thank you

Expand full comment
32 more comments...

No posts